WebSep 5, 2024 · Primark also contended that any attempt by Truworths to use the PRIMARK mark would constitute trade mark infringement under ss 34(1)(b) and (c) and 35 of the Act. It was accordingly submitted that we should exercise our discretion to refuse an order for … http://www.schindlers.co.za/wp-content/uploads/kalins-pdf/singles/truworths-ltd-v-primark-holdings-989-20242024.pdf
Who’s interested in Primark? - Lexology
WebMar 23, 2016 · Truworths Ltd v Primark Holdings (989/2024)2024. Wed, 13 Mar 2024 by Kinisha Moodley. SUMMARY In casu, the appellant is Truworths Ltd (“Truworths”) a well-known fashion retailer in South Africa and the respondent is Primark Holdings, a discount fast-fashion clothing retailer ... WebJan 31, 2024 · Truworths brought a cancellation application against Primark Holdings’ registration for PRIMARK on the basis that the mark had not been used. A mark can be … greek gods starting with s
Truworths Ltd v Primark Holdings (989/2024)2024.
WebTruworths contended that there had been no bona fide use of the mark for the statutory period prescribed in s 27(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 194 of 1993. Primark Holdings contended that PRIMARK was a well-known mark, which was entitled to protection under the provisions of the Paris Convention and protected under s 35(1) of the Trade Marks Act ... WebSep 5, 2024 · The trademark battle between UK-based PRIMARK and Truworths came in 2024 after Truworths successfully removed the Primark Holdings trademark from the South African trademark register, arguing ‘lack of use’. In 2024, Truworths proceeded to establish a value brand using this brand and has since been embroiled in a legal battle with the UK ... WebStore openings will focus mainly on three new Truworths Emporium stores and the expansion of the Primark brand, with R227 million committed to store development. The … flow cytometry filters